基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.003

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 20-26.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.003

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制

安宇研究员, 王袆, 李子琪, 张姜博南, 佟瑞鹏^** 教授

中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2020-07-19 修回日期:2020-09-18 出版日期:2020-10-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
通讯作者: **佟瑞鹏(1977—),男,黑龙江穆棱人,博士,教授,主要从事行为安全管理、环境风险评估、职业心理健康方面的研究。E-mail:tongrp@cumtb.edu.cn。
作者简介:安宇 (1976—),男,黑龙江海伦人,博士,研究员,主要从事校园安全管理、行为安全管理等方面的研究。E-mail: anyu@ cumtb.edu.cn。王袆 (1997—),女,河北石家庄人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为行为安全管理。E-mail: wanghui08129@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51674268;52074302)。

Research on formation mechanism of miners' unsafe behaviors based on TPB

AN Yu, WANG Hui, LI Ziqi, ZHANG Jiangbonan, TONG Ruipeng

School of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2020-07-19 Revised:2020-09-18 Online:2020-10-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为有效管理矿工的不安全行为,整体系统地分析矿工不安全行为的诱发因素及机制,从心理学角度出发,基于不安全行为的主观性,将不安全行为分为非意向性和意向性2类;以计划行为理论(TPB)和2-4模型为理论框架,构建基于TPB的事故致因模型,并采用Meta分析验证该模型的正确性。结果表明:2种不安全行为的形成机制不同,由与安全相关的组织因素和个体因素的不同组合模式解释;非意向性不安全行为的主要影响因素是个体驱动因素,即安全意识、安全知识、安全习惯和安全生理;意向性不安全行为的主要影响因素是个体行为意向,即行为态度、主观规范和知觉行为控制。

关键词: 计划行为理论(TPB), 矿工不安全行为, 2-4模型, 事故致因模型, Meta分析

Abstract: In order to effectively manage miners' unsafe behaviors, analyze the contributing factors and mechanism of miners' unsafe behaviors holistically and systematically, from a psychological perspective, unsafe behaviors were divided into intentional and unintentional behaviors based on their subjectivity.Then, an accident causation model was developed based on TPB and 2-4 model, and validated by using Meta-analysis. The results show that these two categories of unsafe behaviors have different formation mechanisms and are explained by different combinations of organizational and individual factors related to safety. The main influencing factors of unintentional behaviors are personal drivers, including safety awareness, safety knowledge, safety habits and safety physiology. Those of intentional behaviors are behavior intentions, namely attitude toward action, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control.

Key words: theory of planned behavior (TPB), miners' unsafe behaviors, 2-4 model, accident causation model, Meta-analysis

中图分类号:

X912

安宇, 王袆, 李子琪, 张姜博南, 佟瑞鹏. 基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 20-26.

AN Yu, WANG Hui, LI Ziqi, ZHANG Jiangbonan, TONG Ruipeng. Research on formation mechanism of miners' unsafe behaviors based on TPB[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(10): 20-26.

参考文献

[1] 吴红玉. 基于生理测量的矿工不安全行为实验研究[D]. 河南: 河南理工大学, 2016.
WU Hongyu. Research on miners' unsafe behavior based on physiological measurement experiment[D]. Henan: Henan Polytechnic University, 2016.
[2] FU Gui, XIE Xuecai, JIA Qingsong, et al. The development history of accident causation models in the past 100 years: 24Model, a more modern accident causation model[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 134:47-82.
[3] WANG Chen, WANG Jiakun, WANG Xinhua, et al. Exploring the impacts of factors contributing to unsafe behavior of coal miners[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 115: 339-348.
[4] YU Kai, CAO Qinggui, XIE Changzhen, et al. Analysis of intervention strategies for coal miners' unsafe behaviors based on analytic network process and system dynamics[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 118:145-157.
[5] REASON J. Human Error[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1990: 18-39.
[6] ZHANG Yingyu, JING Linlin, BAI Qingguo, et al. A systems approach to extraordinarily major coal mine accidents in China from 1997 to 2011: an application of the HFACS approach[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2017, 25(2): 181-193.
[7] FOGARTY G J, SHAW A. Safety climate and the theory of planned behavior: towards the prediction of unsafe behavior[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(5): 1 455-1 459.
[8] 傅贵, 陆柏, 陈秀珍. 基于行为科学的组织安全管理方案模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(9): 21-27.
FU Gui, LU Bai, CHEN Xiuzhen. Behavior based model for organizational safety management[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 15 (9): 21-27.
[9] FU Gui, XIE Xuecai, JIA Qingsong, et al. Accidents analysis and prevention of coal and gas outburst: understanding human errors in accidents [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 134: 1-23.
[10] 杨佳丽. 煤矿员工不安全行为影响因素及其管理策略研究[D]. 太原:太原理工大学, 2017.
YANG Jiali. Study on the influential factors and management strategies of the coal miner's unsafe behaviors[D]. Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology, 2017.
[11] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[12] SU Yikun, CONG Weiyi, LIANG Huakang. The impact of supervisor-worker relationship on workers' safety violations: a modified theory of planned behaviour[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2019, 25(7): 631-645.
[13] 杨校毅, 佟瑞鹏. 基于Meta分析的矿工不安全行为JD-R模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(12): 75-80.
YANG Xiaoyi, TONG Ruipeng. Research on JD-R model of miners' unsafe behavior based on Meta-analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(12): 75-80.
[14] SCHMIDT F L, HUNTER J E. Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings[M]. California: Sage Publications, 2014: 3-32.
[15] PENG Lu, CHAN A H S. Exerting explanatory accounts of safety behavior of older construction workers within the theory of planned behavior[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(18): 33-42.
[16] BIRON M, BAMBERGER P. Aversive workplace conditions and absenteeism: taking referent group norms and supervisor support into account[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012, 97 (4): 901-912.
[17] ROSENTHAL R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research[M]. California: Sage Publications, 1991: 36-52.
[18] ARMITAGE C J, CONNER M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 40: 471-499.
[19] 成连华, 郭慧敏. 基于SEM的煤矿安全生产影响因素系统研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 137-142.
CHENG Lianhua, GUO Huimin. Study on factors influencing coal mine work safety based on SEM[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(1): 137-142.
[20] ZHANG Yingyu, SHAO Wei, ZHANG Mengjia, et al. Analysis 320 coal mine accidents using structural equation modeling with unsafe conditions of the rules and regulations as exogenous variables[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2016, 92: 189-201.

基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制

Research on formation mechanism of miners' unsafe behaviors based on TPB

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张鸿莹, 王袆, 孙宁昊. 基于Meta分析的高校教师职业压力失范行为JD-R模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 174-180.
[2]	张磊, 彭金栓, 陈晓利. 驾驶分心行为量表设计与影响因素分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 39-46.
[3]	佟瑞鹏, 王露露, 杨校毅, 郭子萌, 安宇. 社会心理风险因素对工人行为安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 18-24.
[4]	傅贵, 吴亚丽, 章仕杰, 杨耀党. 危险源的实质内容分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 1-5.
[5]	张凡, 吕卉焘, 沈小燕, 刘浩学. 计划行为理论下外卖配送员闯红灯行为研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 1-6.
[6]	成连华, 郑庆, 郭慧敏, 严瑾, 周瑞雪. 基于累积效应的事故进程研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12): 35-39.
[7]	杨鸿泰, 苏帆, 刘小寒, 濮莉, 李延来, 刘昱岗. 摩托车驾驶员闯红灯的行为意向研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 21-27.
[8]	杨校毅, 佟瑞鹏. 基于Meta分析的矿工不安全行为JD-R模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(12): 71-76.
[9]	晋良海, 龚润, 陈述, 肖金克, 蔡莉莉, 姚若军. 认知结构变量对起重作业人员违章行为意向的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 8-13.
[10]	傅贵, 薛宇敬阳, 佟瑞鹏, 栗继祖. HFACS与24Model不安全动作因素对应关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 7-12.
[11]	梅强，陈好，刘素霞. 中小企业安全投入行为决策研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 150-.
[12]	田水承，李磊，邓军，景兴鹏，赵泓超，王莉. 基于BioLAB的矿工不安全行为与噪声关系试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 10-.
[13]	李宏汀，刘彦宇，李文书. 驾驶中使用手机对驾驶员行为安全绩效影响综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(1): 16-.
[14]	刘海滨，梁振东. 基于SEM的不安全行为与其意向关系的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(2): 23-.
[15]	段冀阳，李志忠. 驾驶行为模型的研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(2): 30-.